July 22, 2012 - Posted by DrMyrtleMeans

Sexual abuse is so prevalent that it affects nearly every family in some way. Latest national reports on sexual abuse of children states that 1-in-4 girls and 1-in-10 boys report abuse.¬†With these national averages, you could be a victim of abuse or you know some one who has been. One thing is for sure, it is a crime committed by cowards who have victims that are too young to defend themselves. Children can’t process the trauma, leaving them overwhelmed by feelings of sadness, shame, guilt, confusion, fear, anger, and sexual overstimulation.

The media continues to inundate us with more details about the horror that befell young boys at Penn State University at the hands of two monsters: Sandusky and Paterno. I find myself thinking about the many victims of sexual abuse I have treated in my practice. How they have all been forever scarred. While the initial wounds may heal, the trauma of sexual abuse is always apparent. It is evident in their self-esteem, mood (depression and anxiety), relationships, body image, promiscuity or aversion, and broken hearts.

There is this great debate over whether or not Paterno is as bad as Sandusky. We will take Jerry Sandusky’s mental disturbance for granted. He is a sick man. While this in no way minimizes his role in the abuse of 8 or more young boys, he was compelled by an irresistible urge. According to Wikipedia, pedophilia is defined as a psychiatric disorder in persons who are 16 years of age or older typically characterized by a primary or exclusive sexual interest in prepubescent children (generally those under the age of 14, though onset of puberty varies). The prepubescent child must be at least five years younger than the person before the attraction can be diagnosed as pedophilia.

What was Paterno’s excuse? He had none. Or at least none that is acceptable. His motivation: power, money, and prestige (at the risk of the lives of many). I don’t understand how any responsible, reasonable, sane person could stand by knowingly while children were being hurt in such a blatantly horrible manner. I have to assume that Joe Paterno was a sick man too. A man without a heart. A man without honor. A man without a conscience. A man without courage. A man who was no man at all. His illness was narcissism. He was selfish and indifferent to the plight of others.

Sandusky and Paterno are one in the same. Paterno might as well have been a pimp. He provided Sandusky with the means and opportunity to continue to exploit and torture young boys. So many lives could have been spared if someone would have had the courage, no, the common sense, to do the right thing. I hope that every symbol, statue, remembrance of Paterno is forever wiped from Penn State’s history books. Their horrible acts will be forever burned into the minds of their victims. But the rest of us should not be exposed to anything that remotely references these monsters. I hope that Sandusky’s new neighbors welcome him with open arms, and grants him the same kindness he bestowed on his victims.

2 Responses to “Sandusky and Paterno: Two Men One Crime”

  1. e-cigarettes says:

    Howdу I am so thrilled Ι found youг webрage, I reallу founԁ уou by accіdent, ωhile I was seaгching on Goоglе
    for something elѕе, Anyωays I am here noω and
    would just lіke to ѕay thanks for a fаntaѕtic
    post anԁ а all rounԁ еnjοyable blog (I alѕo love thе theme/ԁeѕign),
    I don’t have time to go through it all at the moment but I have book-marked it and also added your RSS feeds, so when I have time I will be back to read a lot more, Please do keep up the great work.

  2. Aladin says:

    This past week, I’ve been amazed at the fndieeg frenzy surrounding Coach Paterno. As Sandusky faded to the background, the finger-pointing began and Paterno became the primary scapegoat as McQuarey, Schultz, Curley and Spanier faded. Most certainly Paterno could have done more/ e.g. accompanied McQuarey to report this to the State College police, to Curley or to personally confront Sandusky. I can’t imagine what thoughts Paterno had at the time but I’m not at all clear, and the Grand Jury transcripts aren’t either, as to just how specific McQuarey was when he told Paterno what he saw. Paterno apologized for not having done more but I’m just not sure what more he should have done considering the uncertainty about what he knew or didn’t know. In spite of this, the Trustee’s firing was justified but the manner in which it occurred was shameful. Spanier was in the meetings. Paterno was not. The Board certainly could have waited until the following morning to tell Paterno personally and announce it at a press conference following. In all of this, let’s not forget, apart from going to the police (remembering it’s unclear just what specifics Paterno knew), Paterno’s only recourse was to tell Curley, his AD. He did that but could and should have done more. His firing, an abrupt end to his legacy, has cast dark clouds over his 60 years at Penn State. Let’s hope with time more becomes clear.

Leave a Reply



Join us on Facebook